| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Sriram RK <sriram(dot)rk(at)outlook(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tvk1271(at)gmail(dot)com" <tvk1271(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: AIX support |
| Date: | 2024-04-25 04:45:13 |
| Message-ID: | Zinf2VOFv49brFuX@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:20:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It would definitely make sense for a new port to start by getting
> things going with gcc only, and then look at resurrecting xlc
> support.
Sriram mentioned upthread that he was looking at both of them. I'd be
ready to assume that most of the interest is in xlc, not gcc. But I
may be wrong.
Saying that, dividing the effort into more successive steps is
sensible here (didn't consider that previously, you have a good
point).
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sutou Kouhei | 2024-04-25 04:53:56 | Re: Is it acceptable making COPY format extendable? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-25 04:44:40 | Re: Why don't we support external input/output functions for the composite types |