Re: Cleanup: remove unused fields from nodes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cleanup: remove unused fields from nodes
Date: 2024-04-25 01:25:36
Message-ID: ZimxEBnGwfNn5TYM@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 08:31:57AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was thinking about wording like
>
> * True if DEALLOCATE ALL. This is redundant with "name == NULL",
> * but we make it a separate field so that exactly this condition
> * (and not the precise name) will be accounted for in query jumbling.

Fine by me. I've just used that and applied a patch to doing so.
Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-04-25 01:31:11 RE: Race condition in FetchTableStates() breaks synchronization of subscription tables
Previous Message Richard Guo 2024-04-25 01:02:34 Re: docs: minor typo fix for "lower(anymultirange)"