| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "keith(dot)fiske(at)crunchydata(dot)com" <keith(dot)fiske(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, "ejberdecia(at)yahoo(dot)com" <ejberdecia(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com" <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15954: Unable to alter partitioned table to set logged |
| Date: | 2024-04-24 07:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | Ziizo3ML2KwsuE9U@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:33:00AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Correct, it is an outright bug that I see no reason not to just fix and
> back-patch. The new feature needs its own thread so as not to have this
> one see the same fate it had 5 years ago.
The semantics have become much more complicated than 5 years ago
because partitioned tables have gained support for more things, one
being the recent addition of identity columns. While I've analyzed
the whole, I have asked myself a couple of questions about what the
best user-friendly behavior would be, implemented one and mentioned
the rest. Anyway, a new thread has been created about this topic, so
feel free to reply there:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZiiyGFTBNkqcMQi_%40paquier.xyz
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-04-24 13:00:00 | Re: BUG #17855: Uninitialised memory used when the name type value processed in binary mode of Memoize |
| Previous Message | Kostiantyn Tomakh | 2024-04-24 06:03:32 | Re: BUG #18433: Logical replication timeout |