| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 |
| Date: | 2024-04-23 04:59:09 |
| Message-ID: | ZidAHRJyMzPZ5JtJ@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> 22.04.2024 13:52, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> >
> > That's weird, I just launched it several times with the patch applied and I'm not
> > able to see the seg fault (while I can see it constently failing on the master
> > branch).
> >
> > Are you 100% sure you tested it against a binary with the patch applied?
> >
>
> Yes, at least I can't see what I'm doing wrong. Please try my
> self-contained script attached.
Thanks for sharing your script!
Yeah your script ensures the patch is applied before the repro is executed.
I do confirm that I can also see the issue with the patch applied (but I had to
launch multiple attempts, while on master one attempt is enough).
I'll have a look.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-23 05:05:03 | Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-23 04:54:48 | Internal error codes triggered by tests |