Re: subscription/026_stats test is intermittently slow?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: subscription/026_stats test is intermittently slow?
Date: 2024-04-20 02:57:45
Message-ID: ZiMvKa2Z0z4dftDo@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:57:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It looks to me like in the first run it took 3 minutes for the
> replay_lsn to catch up to the desired value, and in the second run,
> two seconds. I think I have seen previous instances where something
> similar happened, although in those cases I did not stop to record any
> details. Have others seen this? Is there something we can/should do
> about it?

FWIW, I've also seen delays as well with this test on a few occasions.
Thanks for mentioning it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-20 02:59:45 Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-20 02:55:46 Re: ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD on partitioned tables