Re: Weird test mixup

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Weird test mixup
Date: 2024-04-09 03:41:57
Message-ID: ZhS5BV_FVDsRPSVV@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:29:43PM +0300, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> On 8 Apr 2024, at 11:55, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Uh, I did not understand this. Because commit message was about
>> stabiilzizing tests, not extending coverage.

Okay, it is about stabilizing an existing test.

> Also, should we drop function wait_pid() at the end of a test?

Sure.

> Given that tweaks with are nothing new, I think patch looks good.

Applied that after a second check. And thanks to Bharath for the
poke.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-04-09 03:48:06 Re: Why is parula failing?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-09 03:25:43 Re: Fixup a few 2023 copyright years