Re: Weird test mixup

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Weird test mixup
Date: 2024-04-08 08:55:55
Message-ID: ZhOxGzDaZ81xVxzw@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:42:08AM +0300, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> As an alternative we can make local injection points mutually exclusive.

Sure. Now, the point of the test is to make sure that the local
cleanup happens, so I'd rather keep it as-is and use the same names
across reloads.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-04-08 08:59:17 Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%
Previous Message Amit Langote 2024-04-08 08:39:02 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning