| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25% |
| Date: | 2024-04-08 05:23:07 |
| Message-ID: | ZhN_OxamPomaQJuA@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 06:19:20PM +0200, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> Agreed. While not a full solution, I think this patch is still good to
> address some of the pain: Waiting 10 seconds at the end of my build
> with only 1 of my 10 cores doing anything.
>
> So while this doesn't decrease CPU time spent it does decrease
> wall-clock time significantly in some cases, with afaict no downsides.
Well, this is also painful with ./configure. So, even if we are going
to move away from it at this point, we still need to support it for a
couple of years. It looks to me that letting the clang folks know
about the situation is the best way forward.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-08 05:26:30 | Re: Replace FunctionCall2Coll with FunctionCallInvoke |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2024-04-08 05:17:46 | Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible |