Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Date: 2024-04-05 23:45:08
Message-ID: ZhCNBBfz4db2bVHS@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 01:26:29PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 06:42:21PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 02:08:42PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > Thanks for the report and looking into it. Pushed!
>>
>> Thanks Amit for the commit and Kuroda-san for the patch!
>
> I have been pinged about this thread and I should have looked a bit
> closer, but wait a minute here.

I have forgotten to mention that Zubeyr Eryilmaz, a colleague, should
be credited here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2024-04-05 23:53:30 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-04-05 23:28:19 Re: Streaming read-ready sequential scan code