From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: documentation structure |
Date: | 2024-03-22 00:14:37 |
Message-ID: | ZfzNbXovW5gESc1R@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:12:30AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 22 Mar 2024, at 00:33, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 19.03.24 14:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> >>> It's actually not very odd, the reference section is using <reference> elements
> >>> and we had missed the arabic numerals setting on those. The attached fixes
> >>> that for me. That being said, we've had roman numerals for the reference
> >>> section since forever (all the way down to the 7.2 docs online has it) so maybe
> >>> it was intentional?
> >> I'm quite sure it *was* intentional. Maybe it was a bad idea, but
> >> it's not that way simply because nobody thought about it.
> >
> > Looks to me it was just that way because it's the default setting of the stylesheets.
>
> That's quite possible. I don't have strong opinions on whether we should
> change, or keep it the way it is.
If we can't justify why it should be different, it should be like the
surrounding sections.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-03-22 00:19:48 | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-22 00:12:30 | Re: documentation structure |