From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Date: | 2024-03-18 09:18:37 |
Message-ID: | ZfgG7cwTywMH3jPC@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 09:29:01AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I've also responded to Bertrand's comments here.
Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:56 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > 5 ===
> >
> > -# Check conflict_reason is NULL for physical slot
> > +# Check invalidation_reason is NULL for physical slot
> > $res = $node_primary->safe_psql(
> > 'postgres', qq[
> > - SELECT conflict_reason is null FROM pg_replication_slots where slot_name = '$primary_slotname';]
> > + SELECT invalidation_reason is null FROM pg_replication_slots where slot_name = '$primary_slotname';]
> > );
> >
> >
> > I don't think this test is needed anymore: it does not make that much sense since
> > it's done after the primary database initialization and startup.
>
> It is now turned into a test verifying 'conflicting boolean' is null
> for the physical slot. Isn't that okay?
Yeah makes more sense now, thanks!
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-03-18 09:24:00 | Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-03-18 09:04:44 | Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation |