| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add basic tests for the low-level backup method. |
| Date: | 2024-03-15 05:25:47 |
| Message-ID: | ZfPb29USeLiF_cPJ@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:38:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's why these tests are not that easy, they can be racy. I've run
> the test 5~10 times in the CI this time to gain more confidence, and
> saw zero failures with the stability fixes in place including Windows.
> I've applied it now, as I can still monitor the buildfarm for a few
> more days. Let's see what happens, but that should be better.
So, it looks like the buildfarm is clear. sidewinder has reported a
green state, and the recent runs of the CFbot across all the patches
are looking stable as well on all platforms. There are still a few
buildfarm members on Windows that will take time more time before
running.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-03-15 05:32:52 | Re: Add basic tests for the low-level backup method. |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2024-03-15 05:23:15 | Re: Add basic tests for the low-level backup method. |