Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
Date: 2024-03-15 02:50:57
Message-ID: ZfO3kfgHrXx78G5n@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:46:28PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In the end, while I certainly don't mind improving the web page, I
> > think that a lot of what we're seeing here probably has to do with the
> > growing popularity and success of PostgreSQL. If you have more people
> > using your software, you're also going to have more people using
> > out-of-date versions of your software.
>
> Yeah, probably, and we recently end-of-life'ed PG 11.

In a way it is that we had more users during the PG 10/11 period than
before that, and those people aren't upgrading as quickly.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-03-15 02:58:37 Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-03-15 02:48:37 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum