Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date: 2024-03-22 07:09:14
Message-ID: Zf0ump7z3XUSXJBw@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:49:17AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:21 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please find the v14-0001 patch for now.

Thanks!

> LGTM. Let's wait for Bertrand to see if he has more comments on 0001
> and then I'll push it.

LGTM too.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anton A. Melnikov 2024-03-22 07:29:38 Re: Bug in nbtree optimization to skip > operator comparisons (or < comparisons in backwards scans)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-03-22 07:02:19 Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded