From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | dansonlinepresence(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: substring start position behavior |
Date: | 2024-03-06 03:24:47 |
Message-ID: | Zefh_2-e9ILgmCjW@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 09:47:54PM -0500, dansonlinepresence(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> Thanks for all that context and diff! The odd behavior is indeed in
> the SQL spec. At least I was convinced of that on postgres IRC by
> someone who seemed to have quoted from the spec. I don't think the
> feature ought to be hidden because it's odd.
>
> If I may suggest some specificity to the wording here, I think "start
> values less than 1" would avoid confusion about whether 0 is
> nonpositive or not, and bring attention to the function being
> 1-indexed rather than 0-indexed.
Sure, updated patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
substring.diff | text/x-diff | 1.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-03-06 05:42:09 | Re: substring start position behavior |
Previous Message | dansonlinepresence | 2024-03-06 02:47:54 | Re: substring start position behavior |