| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: UUID v7 |
| Date: | 2024-03-12 05:53:27 |
| Message-ID: | Ze_t1zQA7veSKPGr@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:27:43PM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> Sorry for this long and vague explanation, if it still seems too
> uncertain we can have a chat or something like that. I don't think
> this number picking stuff deserve to be commented, because it still
> is quite close to random. RFC gives us too much freedom of choice.
Speaking about the RFC, I can see that there is a draft but nothing
formal yet. The last one I can see is v14 from last November:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-uuidrev-rfc4122bis-14
It does not strike me as a good idea to rush an implementation without
a specification officially approved because there is always a risk of
shipping something that's non-compliant into core. But perhaps I am
missing something on the RFC side?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-03-12 06:10:37 | Re: UUID v7 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-03-12 05:36:58 | Re: Spurious pgstat_drop_replslot() call |