From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Set log_lock_waits=on by default |
Date: | 2024-02-07 15:08:14 |
Message-ID: | ZcOc3lTqve+aWyb2@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> >> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I was, and remain, of the opinion that that was a bad idea that
> >>> we'll eventually revert, just like we previously got rid of most
> >>> inessential log chatter in the default configuration.
>
> >> Unsurprisingly, I want to argue against that.
>
> > I tend to agree with this position- log_checkpoints being on has been a
> > recommended configuration for a very long time and is valuable
> > information to have about what's been happening when someone does go and
> > look at the log.
>
> We turned on default log_checkpoints in v15, which means that behavior
> has been in the field for about sixteen months. I don't think that
> that gives it the status of a settled issue; my bet is that most
> users still have not seen it.
Apologies for not being clear- log_checkpoints being on has been a
configuration setting that I (and many others I've run into) have been
recommending since as far back as I can remember.
I was not referring to the change in the default.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | just madhu | 2024-02-07 15:23:20 | Re: pgjdbc is not working with PKCS8 certificates with password |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-07 15:05:44 | Re: Set log_lock_waits=on by default |