Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Date: 2024-02-01 12:33:04
Message-ID: ZbuPgNozaG71cCBu@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:25:12PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't think we should pretend like one of the two paragraphs above
> is valid and the other is hot garbage. That's not solving anything. We
> can't resolve the tension between those two things in either direction
> by somebody hammering on the side of the argument that they believe to
> be correct and ignoring the other one.

What if we generate log messages when certain commands are used, like
ALTER TABLE? We could have GUC which controls which commands are
logged.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-02-01 12:47:06 RE: speed up a logical replica setup
Previous Message Shinya Kato 2024-02-01 12:22:48 Re: Fix bugs not to discard statistics when changing stats_fetch_consistency