From: | Lew <lew(at)lewscanon(dot)nospam> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: varchar vs text columns |
Date: | 2007-07-24 13:16:49 |
Message-ID: | ZbCdnTkmkddcZjjbnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@comcast.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Jessica Richard wrote:
>> What is the difference between varchar and text for a string column?
>> What is the benefit of using each one?
>> Is text better than varchar performance wise?
>
> From the manual:
>
> Tip: There are no performance differences between these
> three types, apart from the increased storage size when using
> the blank-padded type. While character(n) has performance
> advantages in some other database systems, it has no such
> advantages in PostgreSQL. In most situations text or
> character varying should be used instead.
>
> Note that varchar(n) will have a performance effect, because on
> insert or update you have to check to make sure the input doesn't
> exceed the specified length.
See also Peter Koczan's reply in the '"_" in a serach pattern' thread.
--
Lew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-24 14:04:10 | Re: problems installing postgresql on Mandriva linux |
Previous Message | tech | 2007-07-24 11:48:55 | Set up a database without backup |