Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date: 2025-04-09 17:17:32
Message-ID: Z_arrB_gbpUSpFKW@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:41:06PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:39 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've also verified that the dependency information is carried over in
>> upgrades to later versions (AFAICT all the supported ones).
>
> If I remember correctly the change to not copying
> pg_largeobject_metadata data file but instead moving LOs as part of
> schema was done in v12 when oid,, which had been a system column in
> v11, became a user column, so upgrade to v11 is likely also missing
> the dependencies

Right.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-04-09 17:44:40 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-04-09 17:16:44 Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects