From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Date: | 2025-04-08 15:13:51 |
Message-ID: | Z_U9L_UsfZtP_qnT@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 7:32 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Uh, where are we on the inclusion of curl in our build? Maybe it was
> > explained but I have not seen it.
>
> The above is discussing a patch to split this into its own loadable
> module. Andres and Christoph's feedback has been shaping where we put
> that module, exactly.
Uh, I was afraid that was the case, which is why I asked. We have just
hit feature freeze, so it is not good that we are still "shaping" the
patch. Should we consider reverting it? It is true we still "adjust"
patches after feature freeze.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-08 15:19:31 | Re: Feature freeze |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-04-08 15:13:47 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |