From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: initdb username doc bug |
Date: | 2024-01-08 21:26:22 |
Message-ID: | ZZxofrDqv4XIlflL@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 11:27:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Or just the bit more verbose “user running the initdb command” and don’t
> > bother giving it a label, which is basically the approach used in the
> > description for initdb anyway.
>
> Or if you want a few more words, "name of the operating-system user
> running initdb". I don't like "installation user", that's just about
> as vague as could be.
Agreed, updated patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
initdb.diff | text/x-diff | 813 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-01-08 21:31:52 | Re: initdb username doc bug |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-01-08 15:37:21 | Re: Grammar suggestion |