| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
| Date: | 2024-01-03 23:54:32 |
| Message-ID: | ZZXzuJ2-akhANSPl@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 03:18:50PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think it would be good to finish the pending patch to improve the
> IsBinaryUpgrade check [1] which we decided to do once this patch is
> ready. Would you like to take that up or do you want me to finish it?
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZU2TeVkUg5qEi7Oy%40paquier.xyz
> [2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZVQtUTdJACnsbbpd%40paquier.xyz
Yep, that's on my TODO. I can send a new version at the beginning of
next week. No problem.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cedric Villemain | 2024-01-03 23:57:33 | doing also VM cache snapshot and restore with pg_prewarm, having more information of the VM inside PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-01-03 23:53:11 | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests |