Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, Anton Kirilov <antonvkirilov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
Date: 2023-12-31 00:37:31
Message-ID: ZZC3ywNby6FtSagL@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 12:52:30PM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 09:20, Anthonin Bonnefoy
> <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> wrote:
> > \syncpipeline
> > tps = 2607.587877 (without initial connection time)
> > ...
> > \endpipeline
> > \startpipeline
> > tps = 2290.527462 (without initial connection time)
>
> Those are some nice improvements. And I think once this patch is in,
> it would make sense to add the pgbench feature you're suggesting.
> Because indeed that makes it see what perf improvements can be gained
> for your workload.

Yeah, that sounds like a good idea seen from here. (Still need to
look at the core patch.)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-12-31 00:44:32 Re: Next step towards 64bit XIDs: Switch to FullTransactionId for PGPROC->xid and XLogRecord->xl_xid
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-12-31 00:31:59 Re: pg_stat_statements: more test coverage