Re: BUG #18240: Undefined behaviour in cash_mul_flt8() and friends

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18240: Undefined behaviour in cash_mul_flt8() and friends
Date: 2023-12-25 09:57:57
Message-ID: ZYlSJREbhM_qNZIT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:52:53AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> At least the infra to be able to achieve that should be here.

Looking at that, I can see that Peter has added a few tests to test
the predictability of plans generated with non-hashable types, and
that these are based on money. See 6dd8b0080787.

One possible pick to replace money for these tests is tsvector, that
cannot be hashed and has an equality operator. Perhaps these had
better be replaced anyway?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nagaraj Raj 2023-12-25 12:10:40 Issue with Running VACUUM on Database with Large Tables
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2023-12-25 09:00:02 BUG #18259: Assertion in ExtendBufferedRelLocal() fails after no-space-left condition