Re: The segmentation fault of Postgresql 9.6.24

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Wang <kevinpgcloud(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The segmentation fault of Postgresql 9.6.24
Date: 2023-12-28 22:40:31
Message-ID: ZY35Xxa27tM2Zfk0@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:20:18PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> This could be pretty much anything, and without seeing where exactly it
> fails it's impossible to say. I see you apparently hit the issue
> repeatedly, and tall the information is *exactly* the same - addresses,
> code, etc. Try decoding the addresses with addr2line, or even better get
> a proper backtrace - either from a core file, or using gdb.

Also, Postgres 9.6 went out of support on November 11, 2021:

https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-12-28 23:42:57 Re: Avoid computing ORDER BY junk columns unnecessarily
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2023-12-28 22:20:18 Re: The segmentation fault of Postgresql 9.6.24