Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?
Date: 2023-12-11 10:52:00
Message-ID: ZXbp0PzPI_a2ESHT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 01:45:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Looks acceptable to me. Does somebody object to this removal?

Hearing nothing, done that.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2023-12-11 11:17:50 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Junwang Zhao 2023-12-11 10:44:39 Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations