Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Marek Szuba <marecki(at)gentoo(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date: 2023-11-30 11:45:43
Message-ID: ZWh157rNk2AJ5FXn@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Thomas Munro
> I randomly remembered this topic after seeing an s390x announcement
> from Christoph[1], and figured he or someone else might be interested
> in the same observation about that platform. That is, we finally got
> around to defining this for ARM, but I bet one internet point that
> RISCV64 and s390x have that property too (but would need to find a
> written reference, or perhaps a similar declaration in the Linux
> sources, etc):

Fwiw, while s390x is admittedly more of historical interest, riscv64
is well on the way of becoming an official release architecture with
the next Debian stable release, so having it supported properly by
PostgreSQL would be appreciated.

Christoph

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-11-30 11:51:38 Re: [Proposal] global sequence implemented by snowflake ID
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-11-30 11:40:28 Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE