From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Wrong result for comparing ROW(...) with IS NOT NULL |
Date: | 2023-11-13 20:21:14 |
Message-ID: | ZVKFOkIf39yXyLZk@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 07:38:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Also, nothing in 9.2 precludes composite and row constructor comparisons from
> > being included there, and the intro material suggests that they probably should
> > be. That we cover the details of (composite IS DISTINCT FROM composite) in
> > 9.24 instead of 9.2 should be noted in 9.2 somewhere and a link to 9.24
> > provided.
> >
> > I do agree with changing the identifier to be more unique but I don't know if
> > it is this simple.
>
> In reviewing this three-year-old email, I developed the attached patch
> which I think captures what David suggested above.
Patch applied to master.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-11-13 20:30:54 | BUG #18194: Missing install instructions |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-11-13 20:13:56 | Re: BUG #18179: Cluster History Error |