| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Burns <david(dot)burns(at)fedex(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Version 14/15 documentation Section "Alter Default Privileges" |
| Date: | 2023-11-13 19:28:05 |
| Message-ID: | ZVJ4xQoiSyS6qo49@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 01:12:24PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > I find the above sentence odd. What is its purpose?
>
> I cannot count how many times I have seen the complaint "I have run ALTER DEFAULT
> PRIVILEGES, and now when some other user creates a table, the permissions are
> unchanged". People tend to think that if you omit FOR ROLE, the change applies to
> PUBLIC.
>
> Your improved documentation of "target_role" already covers that somewhat, so if
> you don't like the repetition, I'm alright with that. I just thought it might
> be worth stating it explicitly.
>
> I think your patch is fine and ready to go.
Patch applied back to PG 16.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-11-13 19:33:33 | Re: Version 14/15 documentation Section "Alter Default Privileges" |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-11-13 16:23:16 | Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2023-11-13 19:31:16 | Re: Bug: RLS policy FOR SELECT is used to check new rows |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-11-13 19:22:30 | Re: trying again to get incremental backup |