| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Changing references of password encryption to hashing |
| Date: | 2023-11-22 21:28:51 |
| Message-ID: | ZV5yk4Eh1E9NDe8D@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:52:23PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-11-21 22:43:48 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Is there any interest in fixing our documentation that says encrypted
> > when it means hashed? Should I pursue this?
>
> What's the point of randomly reviving threads from 6 years ago, without any
> further analysis?
Well, I feel like this is an imporant change, and got dropped because it
was determined to not be a new change in Postgres 10. Still I think it
should be addressed and am looking to see if others feel the same.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tristan Partin | 2023-11-22 21:29:45 | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-11-22 21:27:56 | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? |