Re: Documentation of FOR ROLE clause of ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES missing

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: rightfold(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation of FOR ROLE clause of ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES missing
Date: 2023-11-21 21:49:37
Message-ID: ZV0l8fkJAKzb4ndu@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 07:50:19PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-alterdefaultprivileges.html
> Description:
>
> The documentation of ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES statements seems to lack an
> elaboration of the FOR ROLE clause.
>
> It specifies what restrictions exist (namely "The name of an existing role
> of which the current role is a member."), but what the specified role is
> actually used for remains a mystery.
>
> The documentation should read something like: "The default permissions are
> only granted on objects created by this role."

I know this is five years late, but we fixed this issue and the new docs
will appear in Postgres 17:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-alterdefaultprivileges.html

We felt the doc rewrite was too extensive to backpatch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-22 01:11:55 Re: [DOCS] The reference to 'atacontrol' on FreeBSD is outdated.
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-11-21 03:20:57 Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE OF clause documentation implies use of table_names rather than aliases