| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? |
| Date: | 2023-11-02 07:22:37 |
| Message-ID: | ZUNOPSPQc_9Lkz6j@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 08:19:35PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> No tests were introduced. Is this the only existing one that's
> unstable as far as you saw?
That seems to be the only one.
> I'm not yet seeing any failures in the buildfarm, so don't really want
> to push a fix for this one if there are going to be a few more
> unstable ones to fix. I may just hold off a while to see.
The CF bot is also thinking that this is not really stable, impacting
the tests of the patches:
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6685074121293824
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4739402799251456
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5209803589419008
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-11-02 08:28:20 | Re: "box" type description |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2023-11-02 07:19:35 | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? |