Quick Links

Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification
Date:	2023-10-31 01:33:25
Message-ID:	ZUBZZZPFSJAOSEOF@paquier.xyz
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 04:10:17PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> I didn't like the commit message. Here is the corrected patch. Sorry
> for the noise.

Sounds pretty much OK to me. Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification at 2023-10-30 13:10:17 from Aleksander Alekseev

Responses

Re: "38.10.10. Shared Memory and LWLocks" may require a clarification at 2023-11-01 06:12:42 from Michael Paquier

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)	2023-10-31 01:46:09	RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message	Michael Paquier	2023-10-31 01:15:21	Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label