Re: pgBufferUsage.blk_{read|write}_time are zero although there are pgBufferUsage.local_blks_{read|written}

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgBufferUsage.blk_{read|write}_time are zero although there are pgBufferUsage.local_blks_{read|written}
Date: 2023-10-30 23:17:52
Message-ID: ZUA5oG9Z_X9pDJvy@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:14:16PM +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> some things will definitely break, but that's 100% OK. The change seems
> needed, and I can update my parser to deal with it :)

Thanks for the input. I was looking yesterday if this code was
available somewhere, but couldn't find it.. Until this morning:
https://gitlab.com/depesz/explain.depesz.com.git

And.. It looks like things would become better if we change
"shared/local" to "shared", because the parsing code seems to have an
issue once you add a '/'. All the fields in I/O Timings are
considered as part of a Node, and they're just included in the output.
Now, pasting a plan that includes "shared/local" drops entirely the
string from the output result, so some information is lost. In short,
imagine that we have the following string in a node:
I/O Timings: shared/local write=23.77

This would show up like that, meaning that the context where the
write/read timings happened is lost:
I/O Timings: write=23.77

If we switch back to "shared", the context would be kept around. Of
course, this does not count for all the parsers that may be out
there, but at least that's something.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2023-10-31 00:00:00 Re: Infinite Interval
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-10-30 22:43:14 Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats