Quick Links

Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug
Date:	2023-10-28 11:01:46
Message-ID:	ZTzqGifFE0Ia6HR4@paquier.xyz
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:44:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, we should fix this if only for clarity's sake.
> I do not feel a need to back-patch though.

Agreed. Thanks for the commit.
--
Michael

In response to

Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug at 2023-10-28 01:44:30 from Tom Lane

Responses

Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug at 2023-11-11 00:00:00 from jian he

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Victor Wagner	2023-10-28 13:48:29	Re: Enderbury Island disappeared from timezone database
Previous Message	Michael Paquier	2023-10-28 11:00:00	Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?