From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Document parameter count limit |
Date: | 2023-10-26 23:01:38 |
Message-ID: | ZTrv0r3U0jtG1mK8@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 06:56:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Here is a patch to add this.
>
> "function arguments" seems like a completely wrong description
> (and if we do want to document that limit, it's 100).
>
> "query parameters" would work, perhaps.
Ah, I was confused. I documented both in the attached patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
limit.diff | text/x-diff | 592 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-10-26 23:03:03 | Re: Document aggregate functions better w.r.t. ORDER BY |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-10-26 22:56:53 | Re: Document parameter count limit |