| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
| Date: | 2023-10-26 07:39:26 |
| Message-ID: | ZToXrkW1wAfVWOrk@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 05:32:52PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Such a use case is possible to achieve even without this patch.
> Sawada-San has already given an alternative to slightly tweak the
> steps mentioned by Julien to achieve it. Also, there are other ways to
> achieve it by slightly changing the steps. OTOH, it will create a
> problem for normal logical replication set up after upgrade as
> discused.
So, now that 29d0a77fa6 has been applied to the tree, would it be time
to brush up what's been discussed on this thread for subscribers? I'm
OK to spend time on it.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema | 2023-10-26 08:00:53 | Re: libpq async connection and multiple hosts |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-10-26 07:31:19 | Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()? |