| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support |
| Date: | 2023-10-19 23:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | ZTG9pbzvKdk35kpO@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:16:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We removed support for the HP-UX OS in v16, but left in support
> for the PA-RISC architecture, mainly because I thought that its
> spinlock mechanism is weird enough to be a good stress test
> for our spinlock infrastructure. It still is that, but my
> one remaining HPPA machine has gone to the great recycle heap
> in the sky. There seems little point in keeping around nominal
> support for an architecture that we can't test and no one is
> using anymore.
Looks OK for the C parts.
> Hence, the attached removes the remaining support for HPPA.
> Any objections?
Would a refresh of config/config.guess and config/config.sub be
suited? This stuff still has references to HPPA.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-20 00:05:48 | Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-10-19 23:29:53 | Re: [patch] pg_basebackup: mention that spread checkpoints are the default in --help |