Re: Add support for AT LOCAL

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date: 2023-10-16 23:25:29
Message-ID: ZS3GaSuqwi_TauDQ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:54:41AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm mighty tempted though to (a) add coverage for timetz_izone
> to HEAD, and (b) backpatch the new tests, sans the AT LOCAL case,
> to the back branches (maybe not v11).

I see that you've already done (a) with 2f04720307. I'd be curious to
see what happens for (b), as well, once (a) is processed on hornet
once..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-10-16 23:31:14 Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-10-16 23:21:39 Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label