Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.
Date: 2023-09-29 01:41:04
Message-ID: ZRYrMFFMGKn_9RYe@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 04:57:06PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Sure. I found the concept behind 0002 sound. Feel free to go ahead
> with 0001, and I can always look at the second. Always happy to help.

For the sake of the archives:
- Amit has applied 0001 down to 16 as of 54ccfd65868c.
- I've applied 0002 after on HEAD as of 9210afd3bcd6.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-09-29 01:57:07 Re: Index range search optimization
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-29 01:35:09 Re: [PGdocs] fix description for handling pf non-ASCII characters