| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pete Storer <Pete(dot)Storer(at)sas(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FW: Query execution failure |
| Date: | 2023-09-28 02:27:34 |
| Message-ID: | ZRTklpZCVC0Hy/jp@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:06:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > The attached patch documents this remote sort order requirement.
>
> That seems like quite a random place to insert the documentation.
> I doubt that the requirement applies only to upper paths -- FDWs
> are allowed to return sorted paths for base relations too,
> comparable to indexscan paths.
That is the only section of the docs that mentions sort pushdown.
I don't see another reasonable location.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2023-09-28 03:22:38 | Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower |
| Previous Message | εΈπ | 2023-09-28 02:09:21 | εε€οΌ Bug of psql meta-command \sf & \sv |