| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | maja zaloznik <maja(dot)zaloznik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Seeming contradiction in 22.1 |
| Date: | 2023-09-27 22:11:44 |
| Message-ID: | ZRSooHXRdtyi9gO0@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:45:03PM +0100, maja zaloznik wrote:
> Thanks David, this is very helpful!
>
> I would have to agree with Tom, that while technically true, the text could be
> reworded. namely it was not obvious to me that i had used a 'packager' to
> install the clusters and therefore was doing something outside the purview of
> the postgres documentation.
>
> To me the last sentence would be clearer if it read something like:
>
> "Most packagers will name this role `postgres` by default, but this is not
> required".
>
> That way it avoids the passive tense which leaves some ambiguity as to who or
> what and when is naming this superuser.
I think the paragraph was trying to do too much so I simplified it,
patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| bootstrap.diff | text/x-diff | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-09-27 23:09:02 | Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2023-09-27 21:28:04 | Re: Certificate authentication docs in multiple places |