| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment |
| Date: | 2023-09-26 21:07:45 |
| Message-ID: | ZRNIIf2MiEcXeAee@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:44:25AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 6 Sep 2023, at 21:13, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> I think we should reword this to just generically claim that holding
> >> the Relation reference open for the whole transaction reduces overhead.
> >
> > How is this attached patch?
>
> Reads good to me, +1.
Patch applied to master. I didn't think backpatching it made much sense
since it is so localized.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-09-26 21:14:26 | Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()? |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2023-09-26 20:19:12 | Re: Add const qualifiers |