| From: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions |
| Date: | 2020-09-25 06:51:45 |
| Message-ID: | ZR0P278MB012202246010B77B6D8620BAD2360@ZR0P278MB0122.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
>> > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
>> > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
>> > I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily
>> > identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user.
>>
>> Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility. There is a bit
>> more that we could consider though? For example, what about
>> "relocatable" and "requires"?
>+1, and also the schema (for non relocatable extensions).
+1
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2020-09-25 08:04:53 | Re: Can I get some PostgreSQL developer feedback on these five general issues I have with PostgreSQL and its ecosystem? |
| Previous Message | tutiluren | 2020-09-25 05:40:11 | Re: Can I get some PostgreSQL developer feedback on these five general issues I have with PostgreSQL and its ecosystem? |