From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Ryoga Yoshida <bt23yoshidar(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug fix in vacuumdb --buffer-usage-limit xxx -Z |
Date: | 2023-09-21 02:32:57 |
Message-ID: | ZQurWbkV9KJ96LSf@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:44:49AM +0900, Ryoga Yoshida wrote:
> When --buffer-usage-limit option is specified, vacuumdb issues VACUUM or
> VACUUM ANALYZE command with BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option. Also if
> --buffer-usage-limit and -Z options are specified, vacuumdb should issue
> ANALYZE command with BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option. But it does not. That is,
> vacuumdb -Z seems to fail to handle --buffer-usage-limit option. This seems
> a bug.
>
> You can see my patch in the attached file and how it works by adding -e
> option in vacuumdb.
Good catch, indeed the option is missing from the ANALYZE commands
built under analyze_only. I can also notice that we have no tests for
this option in src/bin/scripts/t checking the shape of the commands
generated. Could you add something for ANALYZE and VACUUM? The
option could just be appended in one of the existing cases, for
instance.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lepikhov Andrei | 2023-09-21 02:49:16 | Re: Comment about set_join_pathlist_hook() |
Previous Message | bt23nguyent | 2023-09-21 02:18:00 | Re: Improve the log message output of basic_archive when basic_archive.archive_directory parameter is not set |