Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary
Date: 2023-09-23 00:05:42
Message-ID: ZQ4r1vHcryBsSi_V@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:35:05AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hmm, OK, tricky choices. Anyway, I guess the next thing to straighten
> out in this area is the OOM policy.
>
> Pushed. Thanks Alexander and everyone for the report, testing and
> help! Time to watch the build farm to see if that Perl turns out to
> be robust enough...

Looks pretty stable to me. I can see one thing in wrasse related to
pack():
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wrasse&dt=2023-09-22%2023%3A23%3A23
Invalid type 'Q' in pack at t/039_end_of_wal.pl line 139.

I don't have the room to look at that now, perhaps a bit later today
depending on the flow of the wind.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-09-23 00:16:38 Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-09-22 23:35:05 Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary