Re: Release notes wording about logical replication as table owner

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release notes wording about logical replication as table owner
Date: 2023-09-06 19:36:28
Message-ID: ZPjUvO8JuIrvvDZY@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 09:29:25PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> We have:
>
> "This improves security and now requires subscription owners to be
> either superusers or to have SET ROLE permissions on all tables in the
> replication set. The previous behavior of performing all operations as
> the subscription owner can be enabled with the subscription
> run_as_owner option."
>
> How does one have SET ROLE permissions on a table? I think that's
> supposed to be:
>
> "subscription owners be either superusers or to have SET ROLE
> permissions on all roles owning tables in the replication set."
>
> Or something like that? Or can someone suggest a better wording?

You are exactly corrected. Patch attached and applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment Content-Type Size
role.diff text/x-diff 769 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-09-06 20:21:31 Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification
Previous Message Chris Cleveland 2023-09-06 19:32:21 Simple CustomScan example