Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Date: 2023-09-05 11:50:24
Message-ID: ZPcWADeGRwK1WzIb@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Oh ok, out of curiosity, why are 2 whitespaces intentional?

That depends on the individual who write the code, but I recall that
this is some old-school style from the 70's and/or the 80's when
typing machines were still something. I'm just used to this style
after the end of a sentence in a comment.

> That looks good. I just noticed that v5 did re-introduce the "issue" that
> was fixed in 00e49233a9.
>
> Also, v5 needs a rebase due to f691f5b80a.
>
> Attaching v6 taking care of the 2 points mentioned above.

Dammit, thanks. These successive rebases are a bit annoying.. The
data produced is consistent, and the new contents can be grepped, so I
think that I am just going to apply both patches and move on to other
topics.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-09-05 11:55:04 Re: Commitfest 2023-09 starts soon
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-09-05 11:34:14 RE: persist logical slots to disk during shutdown checkpoint