From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation |
Date: | 2023-09-05 05:44:50 |
Message-ID: | ZPbAUmywqWB+8wGY@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:14:58PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> # Build the descriptions. There are in camel-case.
> # LWLock and Lock classes do not need any modifications.
>
> Nit: 2 whitespaces before "There are in camel"
The whitespaces are intentional, the typo in the first line is not.
> + my $waiteventdescription = '';
> + if ( $waitclassname eq 'WaitEventLWLock'
>
> Nit: Too many whitespace after the "if (" ?? (I guess pgperltidy would
> fix it).
Here, perltidy is indeed complaining, but it is adding a few
whitespaces.
> Then, the only diff is:
>
> < Client,WalSenderWaitWal,Waiting for WAL to be flushed in WAL sender process
> ---
> > Client,WalSenderWaitForWAL,Waiting for WAL to be flushed in WAL sender process
>
> That said, it looks good to me.
Ah, good catch. I did not think about cross-checking the data in the
new view before and after the patch set. This rename needs to happen
in 0001.
Please find v5 attached. How does that look?
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-Rename-wait-events-with-more-consistent-camelcase.patch | text/x-diff | 19.0 KB |
v5-0002-Remove-column-for-wait-event-names-in-wait_event_.patch | text/x-diff | 52.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2023-09-05 05:50:12 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-09-05 05:25:06 | Re: Impact of checkpointer during pg_upgrade |